Skip to Content. Skip to Navigation.

News

 
 

Pie pact a recipe for disaster?

28/07/2009 7:31 PM

Related Links

The Collingwood succession plan is bold, innovative and presented on Tuesday by president Eddie McGuire as a magnificent coup for the club, but it's just as likely to end in tears as it is to succeed.

It was a compromise arrangement conceived through necessity to accommodate two icons of the club - the cynical veteran with unfinished business who was not prepared to stand aside for the prodigal son who was not prepared to wait.

As it's turned out, both Mick Malthouse and Nathan Buckley have made significant concessions, and McGuire was right when he said that it's going to take a leap of faith for the arrangement to work.

Malthouse insists there'll never be a need for him to glance over his shoulder in the next two years but even he conceded on Tuesday that a lot can happen in that time.

If the Magpies should find themselves, say, two-and-nine at the 2010 mid-season break - and that's not inconceivable for several clubs have demonstrated in recent seasons how quickly the tide can turn - the pressure for change will be unbearable.

By then Malthouse will be in his 11th year at the club with nothing to show for it and Buckley's credibility will be on the line every time he's prompted to defend to the situation.

Shakespeare would resolve such as scenario by casting Malthouse in the role of Caesar in his death throes, asking - 'et tu Buckley?'

Then again, what if Malthouse in his dotage should enjoy an Indian summer and the Pies manage to subvert the Geelong-St Kilda nexus at the top of the ladder?

Would a premiership provide sufficient leverage for an overhaul of the succession agreement and an extension of Malthouse's tenure at Buckley's expense?

Would the coach-in-waiting be prepared to put his destiny on the shelf, just for a season or two?

Or assuming all goes well in 2011 and the handover takes place smoothly and without fuss, what if the club should falter the following season under its first-year coach?

Would the clamouring start for the club's new director of coaching to return to his old role to show the rookie how it's done?

And how should Buckley feel about having his long-time mentor looking over his shoulder, for surely that's precisely the perspective a director of coaching is required to adopt.

Buckley doesn't take up his new assistant's role until November 1, but already he's changed the dynamics within the club's football department.

His

 
Page12»
Comments
Posted by Stephanie at
28/07/2009 07:05 PM
Paul Roos is a former champion player and premiership coach, and he has summed this up perfectly... Roos said Sydney had no coaching succession plan along the lines of the Mick Malthouse-Nathan Buckley arrangement Collingwood announced on Tuesday, but described the Magpies' decision as "the way of the future". "It doesn't surprise me. Teams are now looking to beef up assistant coaching roles and the senior coaching role is such a big role now, they are starting to look at transition periods and succession plans," Roos said. "In terms of Mick's position, I don't think it's undermined at all. I think it strengthens Mick's position having Nathan there. "I think the days of looking over your shoulder and worrying about assistant coaches are finished." Enough said.
Posted by Dick Lailai at
28/07/2009 07:50 PM
Can't believe the hype over this. Buckley to be assistant coach for two years at the Club he captained. Wow, big surprise ! A first gamer starting next week could have 50+ games up before Buckley takes over. Talk about it in 2012 when its newsworthy. There's three premierships to be won before then. Some 'coup' Pies !
Posted by simon at
28/07/2009 10:11 PM
you wish
Posted by Drop Bear at
28/07/2009 10:21 PM
Great move by the Pies. We keep Mick and get Bucks. By being transparent about how the change over is going to take place the club as headed the media off and made it hard for them to speculate about Mick getting the bullet if we lose a few games on the trot. Win-win.
Posted by adem at
28/07/2009 11:35 PM
I don't care if collingwood get half their side injured early next year there is no way they will be 2 wins 9 losses at the half way mark.
Posted by Spiz at
29/07/2009 04:03 PM
Yes but if the club found themselves in that position with or without Buckley there'd still be calls for Mick to go. At least if something like that did happen, theyd have Bucks to take his place.
Submit a comment
Name
Email
Comment

Mondayitis

 
 

Mondayitis

Every Monday Bruce Eva, Peter 'Crackers' Keenan and Paul Gough will look back over the round that's been and look forward to everything that's coming up. Click here for the latest episode.

 

Latest AFL Headlines

 
 
Cousins in hospital
Cousins in hospital
AFL
11/03/2010 7:05 PM
Star Richmond midfielder Ben Cousins will miss the Tigers' final pre-season hit-out this ...
 
 
Crows line up for spots
AFL
11/03/2010 5:54 PM
 
Rocket amps up hype
AFL
10/03/2010 3:09 PM
 
King to contest ban
AFL
10/03/2010 12:41 PM
 
Johnson ruled out
AFL
10/03/2010 12:28 PM
 
Jurrah blow for Demons
AFL
09/03/2010 6:59 PM
 
No flirting for Saints
AFL
09/03/2010 4:16 PM
 
AFL tightens drug code
AFL
09/03/2010 2:27 PM
 
Lower's bad break
AFL
09/03/2010 11:54 AM
 
King may miss three
AFL
08/03/2010 8:26 PM
 
 
 

Latest AFL Audio

 
 
Icon Luke Power: I'm ready to go
11/03/2010 07:14 PM
 
Icon Eade: Dogs in it to win it
10/03/2010 12:48 PM
 
 

Our Say

 
 
Paul Gough
NAB Cup points the way
Paul Gough
The NAB Cup grand final could well prove a great form line when it comes to sorting out ...more
Paul Gough
NAB Cup? Press snooze
Paul Gough
Just as one-day cricket has run its race, so too it appears has the NAB Cup.more
 

Your Say